Showing posts with label Rock the Net. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rock the Net. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 23, 2009

Erin McKeown Gets Cabin Fever in July


photo by jeff wasilko

We at FMC are always psyched when we hear about artists making DIY work for them. Although you can’t paint with one brush when it comes to musicians — many have wonderful relationships with their labels — it’s clear that today’s performers don’t need big-time backing to make a record and get it out there. And they're also getting way creative with marketing, as we point out in our recent post about Josh Freese and Jill Sobule.

Now, singer-songwriter Erin McKeown (who kicked ass at our most recent Artist Activism Camp and “Musicians Bringing Musicians Home” concert in New Orleans) is drumming up fan support to get her next record in the can and straight to her fans.

McKeown already has six albums and two EPs under her belt and has worked with über-respected artists like Ani DiFranco and Andrew Bird. For her next round of awesomeness, she’s offering fans the opportunity to watch a series of live internet concerts beginning this July called “Cabin Fever.”

The performances — which will include acoustic numbers, cover songs and an interactive, all-request electric set — will be broadcast from random places in and around Erin’s house. You know, hip venues like her living room, front porch and tour van! Proceeds from the project will go to the recording and release of her upcoming album, Hundreds of Lions, which is expected to drop later this year.

We wish Erin the best with what we think is a really cool idea. We’re also guessing that we’ll be seeing lots more of this kind of grassroots innovation from artists. That is, as long as net neutrality is preserved so that musicians have a direct connection to fans. For more information on Erin McKeown and the “Cabin Fever” project, check out her website. To learn more about how important the open internet is to artists, visit our Rock the Net page.

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

The Best Curated Panel Ever?



OK, we know it’s been a while since we’ve talked about net neutrality. But we figured you could use a break. Not that it’s not still relevant — actually, the reason we’ve blogged about the issue so much in the past is because net neutrality — the principle that protects the open internet —is crucial to artists and fans. Today’s musicians depend on the web to reach potential audiences without the interference of gatekeepers, toll collectors and middlemen — which could change if net neutrality goes away.

There have been some promising signs that net neutrality is here to stay, but the fight to preserve the open internet is far from over. (Need a recap? Have a look at our Rock the Net campaign, previous blog posts and our net neutrality fact sheet.)

So, with all this in mind, we figured you might want to check out this discussion sponsored by the Pop Montreal Symposium (a Canadian organization that fosters discussion about music industry issues.) This event took place back in October of 2008, and was moderated by FMC founder and General Counsel, Walter McDonough. Joining Walter in the feisty back-and-forth were music artist Keith Serry, Alain Brunet of the Creators Coalition, NDP MP candidate and journalist Anthony Hamond and technology journalist Anne Lagacé-Dowson. (Walter called this the “best curated panel in the history of panels,” so you know it’s gotta be interesting, at least!)

The conversation touched on issues ranging from the future of the recording industry, the iTunes, illegal file sharing and. . . renowned music authors who were former deadheads? Oh, yeah — and net neutrality is in there somewhere, too.

Monday, February 23, 2009

Caught in the Web



For those of you who were there, you already know that Threads and Cred — last week’s final web.illish.us event at Silk City in Philly — was one kick-ass party. For those of you who weren’t there, here’s a brief run-down on what you missed (You can also watch the video archive from the live webcast at http://web.illish.us/).

The jam-packed event saw local fans ready to hear a bracing mix of hip-hop, jazz rock and instrumental fusion. From the mysterious mood lighting to DJ Dirty South Joe’s between-set mix, it was obvious from the start that Threads and Cred was going to be a memorable (and musically diverse) occasion.

Philly’s Drake opened the show, amazingly and deftly combining two MCs, a cellist, a drummer, trumpeter and singer in a progressive stew that got the crowd hyped up and ready to dance.

Next up was rapper Dice Raw, who impressed with his stellar rhymes and unusual beats. Another local, the MC demonstrated serious versatility and creativity in a one-man show that totally rocked the crowd and clearly left them wanting more.

Headliner MJ Project’s was obviously the crowd favorite as evidenced by the wild audience reaction from the moment they hit the stage. Their funky performance was marked by intense energy which is probably why the exhausted crowd still demanded an extra 15 minute encore.

Whew. Talk about a party!

Thanks to everyone who showed up and supported FMC and realizePhilladelphia for our web.illish.us series, which spread the word about the importance of net neutrality. To learn more, check out our Rock the Net campaign. And visit our main website to see the full spread of musician-oriented issues FMC is working on and ways you can plug in.

Thursday, February 19, 2009

web.illish.us in Philly City Paper!



We'll post a full report about "Threads and Cred" — the final installment of web.illish.us at Silk City in Philadelphia — in just a few, but for now you can check out this preview in Philly's City Paper. The item includes quotes about net neutrality (the underlying theme of this multi-faceted series of events) from Dejha Ti of realizePhiladelphia, our web.illish.us partners.

Check the web.illish.us site for archived video of the live webcast of this and previous episodes.

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

Live! Tommorow! Final web.illish.us event!



Hard to believe three months have gone by and we’re now at the final web.illish.us event, which takes place tomorrow night (Wednesday, Feb. 18) at Silk City in Philadelphia.

Saving the best for last may be an understatement considering tomorrow’s jam-packed event. Appropriately titled “Threads & Cred,” this installment will focus on how net neutrality strengthens creative culture by facilitating innovation, real-time experimentation and collaboration. “Threads & Cred" refers to dialogue threads (as well as a pun on clothing) and the credibility you need to thrive in online (or real-world) communities.

FMC has partnered with realizePhilladelphia (a non-profit group that promotes social causes through musical and educational events) to bring you these events, which raise awareness about the importance of net neutrality to the musical and creative communities. (For more information on why the open internet is so important for musicians, check out our Rock the Net campaign.)

Tomorrow night’s event is hosted by Philly native Charles Gregory and includes performances from hip hop Grammy winner and Roots collaborator Dice Raw, experimental jazz group Drake and the progressive instrumental band MJ Project.

FMC will have our eyes and ears up in Philly, and we’ll report back all the highlights right here. Of course, you can always watch it live on the web via the web.illish.us site — the live music kicks off at at 10 PM, and there's also a studio-produced panel discussion that was pre-recorded on February 12th. This is the final web.illish.us event, so you really don’t want to miss out! Head here for more information; you can watch video archives of the previous “webisodes” here. Hope to see you there!

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

A2IM's Rich Bengloff in Huffington Post


If you've been following FMC's work, you've no doubt heard us talk about the American Association of Independent Music (A2IM) — a forward-looking non-profit organization that represents a broad coalition of independent labels.

A2IM has gone to bat on a number of important issues, including making commercial radio friendlier to independent artists — an effort FMC wholeheartedly supports. In fact, we recently collaborated with A2IM on a report about how indie labels are still having difficulty getting airplay on commercial radio a year after the "Rules of Engagement" with major station groups. (These voluntary agreements were a result of 2006-2007 payola investigations; for more info see our Payola Education Guide.)

On January 15, A2IM President Rich Bengloff published "An Indie Music Memo to the FCC: We Need a Level Playing Field Too" at the Huffington Post. The article calls on the Commission to recognize the indie sector's contribution to the music economy (around 30 percent of all domestic music sold), and says that access to the digital marketplace is crucial to indie artists and labels. That means net neutrality — the principle that protects the open internet — must be preserved. (For more info on net neutrality and the music community, visit FMC's Rock the Net page.)

Bengloff also underscores the need to properly compensate musicians for their creative efforts:

Everyone who embraces the digital model now has access to a global market and can compete. Intellectual Property in general, and music specifically, are big contributors to our economy -- and to our culture. Making certain that open and fair access to market is maintained while supporting fair compensation for the use of music is the worthwhile and achievable goal.

That pretty much hits the nail on the head. Achieving this goal isn't exactly easy, but you can count on groups like A2IM and FMC to keep working towards it nonetheless. You could say the future of music depends on it!

Monday, January 19, 2009

web.illish.us Episode III: Kiss My RSS panel preview

Check out this six-minute panel preview from web.illish.us Episode III: Kiss My RSS! It's about about "How Internet Culture Interacts with the Music Industry," and features Cee Knowledge (Digable Planets), Rich Medina (DJ/Poet/Producer), Anthony Tidd (musician/producer), Montez Roberts (engineer "The Studio") and moderator Andy Hurwitz (Ropeadope Records). Cick here for full panelist bios.



web.illish.us represents a partnership between FMC and realizePhiladelphia to educate the entire web population about the importance of net neutrality — the principle that protects the open internet. Proceeds from the series go to FMC's Rock the Net campaign.

"Kiss My RSS" will be webcast live from Silk City in Philadelphia on Wednesday, Jan 21. The event represents participatory democracy and how blog culture interacts with social and political issues and entertainment. Music lineup:

Oscillations Quartet

Jef Lee Johnson

Doomstone (by Grimace Foundation)


Click here for artist bios.

Watch the full length panel on the web.illish.us live webcast in between musical sets. Or even better, attend in person!

Friday, January 9, 2009

Talkin 'Bout the FCC



With a new federal administration on its way, there's been a lot of talk about possible changes at the Federal Communications Commission — the agency charged with regulating the public spectrum (including television and radio broadcasting), as well as "interstate telecommunications" (like the phone lines, radio and cable). Increasingly, the FCC is called upon to deal with internet issues like net neutrality. So you can see why people are paying attention to how things shake out over there.

Some, like law professor Lawrence Lessig, have advocated for scrapping the FCC and replacing it with an innovation-oriented agency. Others have called for a more measured approach. On January 5, 2009, the Washington group Public Knowledge co-presented (with Silicon Flatirons) "Reforming the Federal Communications Commission"— a conference that examined the agency's history while discussing its possible future.

Now, Public Knowledge and has launched a website "to provide information and solicit your suggestions about what changes need to take place at the FCC for the agency to restore the public’s confidence that it will meet its legal obligation to promote the 'public interest, convenience and necessity.'"

The site contains papers and opinions from leading minds in the field. It's pretty wonky stuff, but there's tons of good information about how the FCC can better serve the public interest while allowing for marketplace innovations.

So what does any of this have to do with music? Plenty, actually. Whether its the airwaves or the internet, artists need to be able to reach potential audiences. That's why FMC has worked to fight consolidation in radio station ownership and stop payola, both of which have kept too much talent off the dial. And it's why we support net neutrality, which lets all artists — established or developing — compete on a level online playing field with the biggest companies.

FMC wants more artists to be able to connect with more listeners, so we look at changes in the policymaking landscape as an opportunity to get some stuff right on behalf of musicians. If you want to know more about these issues, you should check out our D.C. Policy Day on February 11, 2009. As always, we're offering musician scholarships — click here to apply. And stay tuned for more news about this exciting event!

Monday, December 22, 2008

The Net Effect.



Today (Dec. 22, 2008), the Media & Democracy Coalition — of which FMC is a member — released a "Statement of Public Interest Groups on Proposed Broadband Principles in Upcoming Economic Stimulus Package." That's a mouthful, we know. Despite its tongue-twisting title, the document offers well-thought out reasons why policymakers should focus on a coherent national broadband policy that includes accountability, local approaches, metrics for access and adoption, and a committment to open network structures.

FMC believes that better broadband penetration will expand the legitimate digital music marketplace, and ultimately connect more artists with more listeners. We also think that any internet strategy must honor the principles of net neutrality, which provides all musicians — established or developing — with a means to reach potential audiences. And as you may have noticed, we're pretty into localism — be it in community-based broadcasting or online initiatives that contribute to sustainable cultural communities.

The following is from the intro of the statement:

President-Elect Barack Obama and Congressional leaders are calling for government support to fund universal broadband Internet access as part of a potential economic stimulus package. We applaud these discussions and strongly believe that providing every community in America with high-speed Internet access – particularly those who have long remained on the margins of public participation and debate – is essential to the economic and democratic future of the U.S.

The undersigned organizations, which represent a broad coalition of local and national public interest groups, strongly support investments in broadband build-out, as well as the training, tools and other resources needed to connect those that are currently on the wrong side of the digital divide.


The economy is inextricably tied to infrastructure, of which the internet is an increasingly large part. We hope that the incoming leadership recognizes this, and takes steps to enhance democracy, culture and American competitiveness through smart and forward-looking broadband policies. The future of music (and so much more) depends on it.

Read the full statement here.

Thursday, December 18, 2008

Dear Mr. President-Elect



Today (December 18, 2008), more than 100 groups, unions, musicians, bloggers and media and technology leaders sent a letter to President-Elect Barack Obama calling on his administration to appoint leaders who will reform the media and protect the open Internet. FMC (and members of Pearl Jam and R.E.M.) were among them.

Below is the text of the letter. Click here (PDF) to see the full list of signatures.

President-Elect Obama:

We congratulate you for putting crucial media and technology issues in the public spotlight. Not only did your campaign embrace new technology and innovative media, you have embraced these values in your policy agenda. Your commitment and detailed plan represent a fundamental shift toward communications policy in the public interest. We happily offer our support and service in pursuit of our common goals.

We look forward to working with the leaders you will appoint to the White House, such as the Chief Technology Officer, the positions on the Federal Communications Commission, the Federal Trade Commission, Corporation of Public Broadcasting and in the Commerce, Education, Justice and Agriculture departments. We urge you to select strong proponents of the public interest who will embrace and enact the policy proposals you made on the campaign trail to shape the future of the media, the Internet, the economy -- and our democracy.

Together, we have a unique opportunity to break with the past, lift the stranglehold industry lobbyists have had on communications policy, and put the public's priorities first. In your own words, you pledged:

  • Protect an Open Internet: To "take a backseat to no one in my commitment to Net Neutrality" and "protect the Internet's traditional openness to innovation and creativity and ensure that it remains a platform for free speech and innovation that will benefit consumers and our democracy."
  • Promote Universal, Affordable Broadband: To see that "in the country that invented the Internet, every child should have the chance to get online" by bringing "true broadband to every community in America."
  • Diversify Media Ownership: To create "the diverse media environment that federal law requires and the country deserves."
  • Renew Public Media: To foster "the next generation of public media," and "support the transition of existing public broadcasting entities and help renew their founding vision in the digital world."
  • Economic Growth: To "strengthen America's competitiveness in the world" and leverage technology "to grow the economy, create jobs, and solve our country's most pressing problems."
  • Open Government: To reverse "policies that favor the few against the public interest," close" the revolving door between government and industry," and achieve "a new level of transparency, accountability and participation for America's citizens."
The more than one hundred people who signed onto this letter -- and the millions more we represent in our organizations, workplaces and communities -- join your call to create a more vibrant and diverse media system and to deliver the benefits of the open Internet and new technology to all Americans.

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

web.illish.us: Digital Love tonight!

web.illish.us — the multifaceted event series to support net neutrality — continues tonight with Episode II: Digital Love. web.illish.us is a partnership between realizePhiladelphia and FMC, with proceeds going to our Rock the Net campaign for net neutrality. The events take place at Silk City in Philadelphia on the third Wednesday of the month through February 18, 2009.

Digital Love goes live on December 17, at 9PM (tonight!), and features musical acts Lo Life (members of Brothers Past, Biodiesel and MJ Project), Dialects (members of Burndown All Stars) and Dephonic. DJs Law One and Ras Heights will keep the party going in between live sets.

The theme this time around is digital inclusion — which is the idea of equal broadband access for everyone, no matter what background or walk of life. Todd Wolfson of Media Mobilizing Project will lead a discussion about this important concept, featuring Beth McConnell of the Media and Democracy Coalition, the Reverend Jesse Brown and Phuong Ninh of the Philadelphia Student Union. Charles Gregory of 3 Guys Don’t Lie will once again play host.

One of the coolest things about web.illish.us is the fact that you don’t have to attend to attend. What? You read that right — the shows are all live webcast. There’s even a live chat that lets you connect with all the other remote viewers.

If you missed the last episode (virtually or in-person), you can check out a video archive here.

Hope to see you there!

Monday, December 15, 2008

Whither Net Neutrality?



You may have seen the article in the Dec. 15 2008 article in the Wall Street Journal about certain pro-net neutrality companies and individuals seemingly acting less supportive of the open internet than they previously had.

The article suggests that Google — a longtime advocate for net neutrality — "has approached major cable and phone companies that carry Internet traffic with a proposal to create a fast lane for its own content." Google's Richard Whitt is quoted as saying his company's proposal would not violate net neutrality principles, but the piece doesn’t provide further details as to why not.

Net neutrality is the principle that protects the open internet, meaning everyone can upload and download the lawful content of their choice without interference from Internet Service Providers (ISPs). But companies like AT&T and Comcast want to charge content providers — including musicians, filmmakers, labels and retailers — a fee for the faster delivery of their sites and services. This would put those unwilling or unable to cut a deal with the ISPs in the slow lane. It's pretty easy to imagine what this would mean to an independent musician or label trying to do business on the web.

With a new administration coming in, many net neutrality advocates feel more confident that there will be explicit rules put in place to protect the open internet. Currently, the FCC's "principles" regarding net neutrality are the only thing preventing ISPs from divvying up the internet into fast lanes and slow lanes. Unfortunately, these principles are vague and difficult to enforce, even on a case-by-case basis (which is so far how the FCC has handled allegations of non-neutral activity by the ISPs). President-Elect Obama has stated his support of net neutrality in the past, so it's reasonable to believe he'll follow through on this commitment once in office. Right?

The WSJ article, while not entirely suggesting otherwise, plants a seed or two of doubt in the mind of the reader. The piece points to a "shift" in position by prominent internet scholar (and alleged Obama associate) Lawrence Lessig as proof, claiming Lessig has "has softened his opposition to variable service tiers." Whether this means consumers paying more for faster internet service (not a violation of net neutrality) or ISPs charging content providers a "toll" to get on the speedy pipes (a clear violation) is not elaborated on.

Lessig took the opportunity to publish a rebuttal to the WSJ article on his blog, claiming the article "is an indirect effort to gin up a drama about an alleged shift in Obama's policies about network neutrality." Lessig disagrees with the assessment that he’s "softened" his position regarding NN — he says he's always been supportive of regulation giving all marketplace comers the same "Most Favored Nation" rate as any company that wants to pay for faster connections. Lessig doesn't, however, say what this means for smaller businesses, entrepreneurs and independent artists who depend on a level internet playing field to reach people. Chances are, they wouldn't be able to afford "most favored" status.

We'll be watching this one closely, for sure. Check out our Rock the Net site for more info on what you can do to support net neutrality.

UPDATE: Check out this New York Times editorial about Barack Obama's internet agenda.

Wednesday, December 3, 2008

FMC's Michael Bracy on Well Rounded Radio

FMC Policy Director Michael Bracy recently spoke with Charles McEnerney of Well-Rounded Radio about why policy matters to the everyday artist, and how decisions made in Washington impact the entire music community — from creator to fan and everyone in between.

Head here to listen to the interview.

Michael also spent some time discussing the issue of net neutrality and FMC's Rock the Net campaign, which raises awareness about the importance of the open internet to musicians and fans.

The Rock the Net CD, which features Wilco, Aimee Mann, They Might Be Giants, Bright Eyes and more, was released in July 2008 via Thirsty Ear Records. You can pick up a copy at Amazon, iTunes, eMusic, Rhapsody or your favorite record shop.

Tuesday, December 2, 2008

Broadband Call to Action



Today, a range of groups from the public and private sector demonstrated their support for a national broadband strategy. Non-profit public interest orgs like Free Press, Public Knowledge, Media Access Project and the New America Foundation joined telecom and internet titans like AT&T and Google to advocate for affordable broadband access for all Americans.

The panel discussion in the Senate Dirksen building featured representatives from AT&T, Google, Free Press, Communications Workers of America, New America Foundation and more. Each speaker described the need for a comprehensive broadband strategy as essential to job creation, international competitiveness, innovation and education.

The ailing economy was front and center in the majority of panelist comments. Larry Cohen of CWA suggested that investment in broadband would create 100,000 telecom-industry jobs, and ultimately result in 2.4 million new jobs throughout the economy.

Ben Scott of Free Press outlined a few problems on the road to better broadband penetration, including availability, adoption rates (which he tied to higher speeds and lower prices), and the lack of computers and appropriate training in many neighborhoods and communities.

FMC believes that smart broadband initiatives will ultimately benefit musicians who live and work in these very communities. In fact, we think digital inclusion and broadband deployment are key to the emergence of a legitimate digital music marketplace where fans can find the music they want, and more artists can reach those fans without the interference of gatekeepers and middlemen.

As technology helps us develop and refine possible new revenue streams for musicians, it becomes all the more necessary to make sure artists can compete on a level playing field. There are encouraging signs that net neutrality — the principle that protects the open structure of the internet — will be at the core of any new broadband policies. Even AT&T — which in the past could hardly be described as pro-net neutrality — seem to have come around to recognizing the importance of open internet structures.

During his comments, Jim Cicconi of AT&T said that his company had an "explicit commitment to the open internet." However, he stopped short of suggesting there needed to be any specific regulation to determine how net neutrality hould be enforced, saying that the FCC's current principles are sufficient. Unfortunately, the vagueness of the existing principles makes them difficult to enforce, even after lengthy investigations such as the recent FCC probe into Comcast's "network management" practices.

We at FMC think it would be in everyone's best interest to have consistent and transparent rules that allow a level playing field for innovators, consumers and creators. Actually, that's the whole reason behind our Rock the Net campaign.

One thing's for sure: there's a lot of work to be done on the road to a legitimate digital music marketplace. A national broadband strategy that upholds the principles of net neutrality is definitely a step in the right direction.

Monday, November 3, 2008

Podcast Interview Series: web.illish.us



Not too long ago, we told you about web.illish.us — a series of multi-faceted music and entertainment events that take place at Silk City in Philadelphia on the third Wednesday of the month from November 19, 2008 until February 18, 2009.

The brainchild of Future of Music Coalition and realizePhiladelphia — a group that promotes social causes through musical and educational events — web.illish.us will help raise awareness about the importance of net neutrality.

Each event highlights a different aspect of the open internet. The first installment, “Level up, ppl,” is an introduction to net neutrality and will focus on the level playing field it provides to creators and musicians.

Musical acts at the November 19 show will include Black Landlord, Tuphace and DJ C Sharp. Speakers will include FMC’s Education Director Kristin Thomson, entertainment attorney and Drexel Music Industry Program Director Marcy Rauer Wagman, studio producer/engineer Robert “Taj” Walton (Fugees, Boyz 2 Men, Wyclef Jean), William Lewis of Big Bloc Entertainment and Geoff DiMasi of P'unk Avenue.

Future shows will focus on “Digital Love” (digital inclusion), “Kiss My RSS” (Participatory Democracy) and “Threads and Cred” (Creative Culture).

If you can't make the shows, don't worry — they'll all be webcast live at the web.illish.us site.

FMC recently had the opportunity to speak with realizePhiladelphia's Dejha Mascellino and Drew Kramer about how they came up with the web.illish.us concept, what people can expect from the events, and why the open internet is important to them. You can listen to it here (right click or option click to download; single click to stream).

We also contributed a post to the web.illish.us blog that explains the connection between net neutrality and musicians. For more information on this issue, visit Rock the Net.

So mark your calendars and bookmark web.illish.us, because these events are gonna be awesome!

Monday, October 27, 2008

Being Your Own Marketer



Today's post at the Copyright Alliance blog got us thinking about how today's musicians develop a fan base. The digital revolution has led to unprecedented ways to connect with potential audiences, but the landscape can be tricky to navigate.

If there's any consensus about what you need to succeed, it's probably much the same as back in the analog era. Talent (even if it's currently only your mom or GF/BF who thinks you've got it) and persistence are still your best bet. The good news is that you've got tons of tools to start convincing the rest of the world.

While there's no shortage of new technologies to promote and distribute your work, getting going can seem daunting. FMC talked about ways to get your music out there at our "What's the Future for Musicians?" events in Chicago and New York City (as well as our earlier seminars in upstate NY) — we'll be archiving the presentations online as soon as they're available.

In the meantime, here are a few interesting places you can visit to learn how to "market yourself."

FMC Advisory Board member Derek Sivers is a hero to many for having started CD Baby — a service that's helped countless indie musicians sell physical discs and get their stuff in digital stores. Derek recently sold the company, but he hasn't given up on helping artists promote their work. His site has tons of DIY tips for musicians, which he's constantly refining and adding to.

Randy Chertkow and Jason Feehan are the authors of a book called The Indie Band Survival Guide, and they also run a website of the same name. (We got to meet Jason in person at our Chicago seminar). The book you have to pay for, but the PDF that it's based on is still free. The site has tons of information about tools you can use to promote your music.

Ariel Hyatt is a publicity expert who appeared at our Big Apple event. Her main site is here. (She's also got a new book called Music Success in Nine Weeks.)

David Rose has a blog called Know the Music Biz that's full of good tips.

It used to be you pretty much needed to have a label or distributor (or spend a lot of time consigning stuff at individual record shops) to get your tunes to retail. Nowadays, you can "stock" your music with all the leading digital stores for a nominal charge. There's the aforementioned CD Baby, which includes digital servicing when they stock your physical disc (you can also opt for digital-only), TuneCore (which also offers CD duplication and marketing tips) and ReverbNation — which recently went from being just a streaming player to a full-service digital distributor.

Of course, once you've made your music available, you gotta let people know about it. Today's artists have a lot of different means to do so — podcasts and webcasts (either their own or other people's), blogs, social network sites and online "radio" stations like Pandora and last.fm. And let's not forget good-old-fashioned terrestrial radio. Indie artists may be mostly locked out of commercial stations, but there are stil plenty of opportunities with non-commercial, Low-Power FM and college broadcasters.

The bottom line is that you've got great deal more opportunity to self-promote than at any other time in history. This might mean a lot of work that doesn't seem to fit into the "rock star" stereotype of boundless leisure. But it also means more control over your musical destiny — something pretty rare in the days of bottlenecks, gatekeepers and middlemen. (If you think musicians should be able to make their own choices about how their music is distributed online, you should check out our Rock the Net campaign for net neutrality.)

Of course, we're curious: what are some of YOUR favorite means to promote your music?

Monday, October 20, 2008

Net Neutrality and Urban Music: Part III



Here's the third part of our series on Net Neutrality and Urban Music, written by hip-hop journalist Eric K. Arnold. The article (which is archived in its entirety here), offers an in-depth look at what the open internet means to the urban music community.

Here's Part I and Part II, in case you missed them.

To learn more about net neutrality, read our net neutrality fact sheet and join our Rock the Net campaign.

Enter the Message Police

Internet filtering techniques are standard practice in countries like Belarus, Burma, China, Cuba, Egypt, Iran, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Vietnam, whose governments “seek to curtail freedom of expression on the Internet,” according to Reporters Without Borders. Yet while the U.S. government has a responsibility to uphold the Constitutional rights of its citizens, telecommunications companies appear to have no such scruples.

This topic is particularly relevant, because censorship has always been an underlying issue in hip-hop and urban music. In addition to direct censorship (i.e. the PMRC’s campaign against explicit rap lyrics in the early ’90s), indirect censorship also exists, mainly in the form of exclusion.

For instance, mainstream rap is often taken to task these days for sexist or violent content, which reflects on hip-hop as a whole. Yet rap’s critics often fail to point out that what you’re not hearing on commercial radio or seeing on video outlets is hip-hop that promotes positive or conscious sentiments – the overwhelming majority of which is released on independent labels. The same holds true for socially-aware or political hip-hop. Ask yourself, when was the last time you heard dead prez, Immortal Technique, Paris, or the Coup on your local “hot urban” radio station?

Without Net Neutrality, the Internet could turn from a fun place where anyone can be a star to a place where only corporate-approved artists get to dance. It also could amount to an end-around run on the First Amendment, if telecommunications giants like Verizon and Comcast have their way.

Both companies have already shown hints of employing below-the-belt tactics with regard to Net Neutrality. Internet free speech advocates have likened Comcast’s “traffic management” tactics to those employed by the Chinese government. According to CNET.com’s Chris Soghoian, “the techniques used by Comcast are essentially the same as those used by the Great Firewall of China.” As Indiana University of Informatics Associate Professor Jean Camp noted, “When China does it, we call it ‘censorship.’"

The potential harm of these practices is considerable. “We have seen network operators block political speech,” Christian Coalition of America spokeswoman Michele Combs said during an April 2008 FCC hearing at Stanford University, a charge she repeated a few days later during a Senate Commerce Committee hearing on “The Future of the Internet.” Combs (no relation to Sean “P.Diddy” Combs) was referring to the King James version of the Bible, but it just as easily could have been politically-explicit rap songs like Immortal Technique’s “The Fourth Branch” or the Coup’s “Captain Sterling’s Little Problem.”

On the bright side, an outpouring of public interest has made a difference on a Federal level, raising hopes that Net Neutrality will be upheld. On August 1, the FCC approved an enforcement order requiring Comcast to stop interfering with P2P files and to disclose its methodology for regulating Internet traffic. This provides some relief for, say, indie producers who send music tracks to artists via the Web, but is only one small victory in a much larger battle.
Making the Link to Urban Music

Net Neutrality is fast approaching critical mass, yet with few exceptions, the issue has flown under the radar of the urban community. As Lyrical Swords author Adisa Banjoko points out, “A little kid who has a two-way isn’t thinking about how that content gets to him.”

However, because today’s urban music audience is so reliant on the Internet, BET's Paul Porter says, “I think this is the one time where hip-hop could have a large voice.”

Yet that voice has so far been largely silent, quite possibly because urban indie artists and labels have been more focused on the issue of illicit downloading than ISPs filtering online content.
“No disrespect, but the concerns of artists. . . are minimal compared to the much larger and more stifling effect on the general exchange of information,” remarked Davey-D, who adds that upholding Net Neutrality is in artists’ own interest, even if they don’t realize it yet.

To Banjoko, “The MP3 thing is a really big red herring. While everybody’s arguing about that, they’re gonna lock down the rest of the game” – ‘they’ being telecommunications companies and corporate media. Congressman Ed Markey (D-MA), who has introduced pro-net a neutrality bill, used similar language at a May 6, 2008 hearing on the issue. “This whole idea that this legislation helps piracy is 100 percent wrong," Markey said. "It's a red herring. We should put an aquarium out here because there are so many red herrings floating around to mislead about what the intent of Net Neutrality is.”

Asya Shein of Fusicology.com says Net Neutrality has been overlooked by the urban community “because there hasn't been proper education to the artists and their reps that can help them better understand the consequences of this very possible looming situation.” It’s important, she adds, to “keep the net free and open for all — censorship online conflicts directly with the Constitution. It would affect all music communities if we had to worry about a controlled Internet.”
What You Can Do, Now

*Take a few minutes to do an Internet search on “Net Neutrality” and read up on the issue.
*Join Future of Music Coalition’s Rock the Net campaign to demonstrate your support of the open Internet.
*Net neutrality is currently being examined at the state and Federal legislative levels; learn more at SaveTheInternet.com
*Tell Comcast and Verizon that censorship is un-American.
* Attend an FCC hearing in your area.
*Forward this article to all your MySpace and Facebook friends.
*Record a song defending Net Neutrality, make a video of it and post it on YouTube.
*Write your favorite urban publication and ask them why they haven’t covered this topic in-depth.
*Support underground and/or indie artists by legally downloading their music.


About the Author:

Eric K. Arnold has been writing about urban music culture since the mid-1990s, when he was the Managing Editor of now-defunct 4080 Magazine. Since then, he’s been a columnist for such publications as The Source, XXL, Murder Dog, Africana.com, and the East Bay Express; his work has also appeared in the San Francisco Chronicle, Vibe, Wax Poetics, SF Weekly, XLR8R, the Village Voice and Jamrock, as well as the academic anthologies Total Chaos and The Vinyl Ain’t Final. Eric began his journalistic career while DJing on college radio station KZSC, and remembers well the early days of hip-hop radio, before consolidation, and commercialization set in. He currently lives in Oakland, California.

Friday, October 17, 2008

Net Neutrality and Urban Music: Part Two



The following is the second installment of hip-hop journalist Eric K. Arnold's article about net neutrality and the urban music world. (You can read the first entry here.)

For more information about why the open internet is crucial to the music community, check out our Rock the Net site. And stay tuned for Part III!


Changing of the Guard: The Evolution of Urban Gatekeepers

Having an Internet presence is especially critical to urban music because of the frenzy of ownership consolidation that all but eliminated small, independent commercial radio stations. As a result, urban radio has become formulaic and bland, with the same 20 or 25 songs in heavy rotation all across the country, and has rarely been accessible to independent artists not affiliated with major labels. (See “The Effect of Consolidation on Urban Radio” for more info).

The past few years have also seen the shrinking of the retail market for CDs. Large music-oriented retailers like Tower have given way to “big box” stores like Best Buy, and digital downloading has also taken a bite out of the retail pie.

The effect of all these trends on the recording industry has been considerable. While the independent labels’ market share continues to grow incrementally, major labels have taken a huge financial hit. Faced with lower revenues, their cost-cutting measures have included everything from dropping artists who don’t sell a certain number of units, to underpromoting acts not deemed a priority, to layoffs and the elimination of traditional A&R departments.

At the same time, commercial radio numbers are down overall. Major players in the radio industry like Clear Channel have begun to target the online social networking market as their desired audiences have increasingly become accustomed to surfing the web in order to hear new music.

Meanwhile, multi-tasking sites like Fusicology and Okay Player have become one-stop multimedia outlets for urban audiences — providing a digital alternative to traditional print publications — while online stations like Breakdown FM have presented music, news, and information left untouched by urban commercial radio. And Vibe.com has featured important political coverage missing from the newsstand edition.

By the same token, popular sites frequented by the young urban demographic like YouTube and MySpace have filled some of the role once played by A&Rs – developing new artists. For instance, The Pack and Soulja Boy built up their online buzz to viral levels, parlaying YouTube views and MySpace hits into commercial success and mainstream radio and video play. These days, many new rap songs are leaked first to YouTube, leapfrogging commercial radio in the buzz-building chain. After Ludacris’ “War with God” was posted online, Luda’s label manager Chaka Zulu told the Associated Press, "It had the Internet going crazy… (YouTube is) a viable marketing tool for us now."

All this has created a situation where the Internet has become a primary resource for the entire urban music industry – and a battleground where indie artists, major labels, radio stations, and telecommunications companies are all jockeying for position.

According to indie rap icon and label owner Paris, “The end result, in my opinion, will be that non-music retailers will soon become the new record companies…The main difference is that these new parent companies will treat their musical pursuits as advertising for the corporate entity, and will not rely on the revenue generated from sale of music at all. It will simply be used to generate interest in other products and services.”

“That’s why [the potential loss of] Net Neutrality is really scary,” BET's Paul Porter says. “Some of the things [telecommunications and cable companies] are trying to do is put a lock on musical freedom.”

He expresses concern that the same thing could happen to the Internet that happened to the radio industry. Urban radio was once “a beautiful thing,” he recalls, but “once consolidation hit, the variety went down, the quality went down.”

Davey-D — one of the few urban journalists who’s consistently covered net neutrality — predicts “a chilling effect” not just on artists, but also “folks gearing up to be their own media.”
He cites a recently announced merger between Clear Channel and Katz Media —which effectively consolidates over 1,200 online stations — as a revenue-siphoning move, which could result in a potential death blow for independent Internet radio. This development makes the fight to preserve net neutrality even more critical, since corporate-free online content is already being threatened.

At a recent panel discussion on the Future of the Independent Artist in San Francisco, Public Enemy’s Chuck D urged the audience to step up their Internet game:

“When (people) talk about net neutrality and preventing online radio shows from happening, or three years from now each email you send out is gonna be taxed with digital postage attached to it. . . these things are realities if you don’t take advantage of what’s out there now.”

As the online landscape continues to be shaped, preserving Net Neutrality becomes tantamount to protecting Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Expression – probably the two most important principles of the Constitution and the First Amendment.


About the Author:

Eric K. Arnold has been writing about urban music culture since the mid-1990s, when he was the Managing Editor of now-defunct 4080 Magazine. Since then, he’s been a columnist for such publications as The Source, XXL, Murder Dog, Africana.com, and the East Bay Express; his work has also appeared in the San Francisco Chronicle, Vibe, Wax Poetics, SF Weekly, XLR8R, the Village Voice and Jamrock, as well as the academic anthologies Total Chaos and The Vinyl Ain’t Final. Eric began his journalistic career while DJing on college radio station KZSC, and remembers well the early days of hip-hop radio, before consolidation, and commercialization set in. He currently lives in Oakland, California.

Thursday, October 16, 2008

Net Neutrality and Urban Music: Part One

e

Not long ago, FMC asked journalist Eric K. Arnold to write an article about net neutrality and the urban music community. (Eric previously wrote about the impact of media consolidation on urban music; check out that piece here.)

We weren't sure if the hip-hop world was familiar with net neutrality, but figured there might be a connection between the scene's entrepreneurial, anti-censorship spirit and the open internet — which allows free expression and gives everyone the same level of access, whether they're a huge company or a bedroom beat-maker.

Eric talked to a wide range of urban music figures from prominent bloggers to hip-hop label chiefs and MCs, and got their opinion on why the internet is crucial to their work. We're publishing his piece in installments right here on the FMC blog — today is the first entry. Stay tuned for more of this fascinating story, and check out our Rock the Net site for more information about the importance of net neutrality to the music community.


Net Neutrality and Urban Music By Eric K. Arnold

Hip-hop has always been about getting the word out, by any means necessary. In the past this meant dealing with all kinds of intermediaries — those gatekeepers at major labels, radio stations, video outlets and magazines who decide which talent rises from the streets to the mainstream. With the Internet, today’s hip-hop artists are taking the hustle into their own hands, finding new ways to connect their words and rhymes with potential audiences without interference or censorship.

When pioneering rapper Too $hort ended his business relationship with Jive Records, his home for 21 years, he decided to start his own independent label, Up All Nite. “I’ve been offered (record) deals,” he says, “but it feels really good to not be a part of the major label big pimpin’. It just feels good to say I don’t need a signature from a label to do a guest appearance on someone’s album.”

To a large extent, the Internet made his decision not to re-sign with a major possible, while allowing him complete creative and artistic freedom. Up All Nite’s online “set-up shop” allows the label to sell new music directly to fans via digital download, thus saving on the manufacturing and distribution costs associated with a traditional brick-and-mortar retail model.

Up in Your Bits

This way of digital life might not last forever. Powerful companies that provide your Internet hookup (Internet Service Providers, or ISPs) are looking to alter the fundamental way the web works, by deciding the wheres, whos and hows of information exchange.That’s why public interest groups, technology experts, innovators and creative types are fighting to preserve net neutrality — the principle that protects the open internet.

If that sounds a bit confusing, you’re not alone. Look at it this way: net neutrality is what allows you to go where you want to go on the Internet, download or upload the legal content of your choice and say what you want to say without undue restriction. Basically, it’s the Internet as you know it.

But the ISPs want to charge those who put content on the web — artists, filmmakers, mix-tape DJs, etc. — an extra fee for speedy delivery of their sites and sounds. Those who couldn’t afford to (or didn’t want to) cut a deal with these huge corporations would be stuck in the slow lane. Currently, all users get equal access to the Internet, regardless of their corporate connections. Which is why the fight to preserve net neutrality is shaping up to be an epic battle for nothing less than the soul of cyberspace.

But Net Neutrality isn’t just about politics and technology; it’s also about artists being able to connect with fans, and vice versa.

“We’ve seen what happens when a majority of musicians have limited access to a communications medium — it’s called corporate radio,” says Michael Bracy, Policy Director for Future of Music Coalition — a Washington, D.C. non-profit that deals with musicians’ issues. “We can’t replicate the mistakes of the past when dealing with new technologies. Net neutrality ensures a level playing field for all musicians, and not just those with major industry backing.”

Eloise Lee is the Net Neutrality Policy Director at Media Alliance, a non-profit media watchdog organization who have been closely following the issue. She says the open internet is of crucial importance to musicians and the public. “If you have a MySpace account, if you rely on the Internet to share your work, Net Neutrality is your issue,” Lee explains.

“The U.S. is about freedom of speech. If Net Neutrality is not protected, all of that would fade. Those rights are under attack,” she adds. Immigrants, youth, people of color and other independent voices have been historically underserved and underrepresented, Lee notes — restricting Internet access would affect these voices disproportionately.

For that reason, it’s not an overstatement to say that the future of the Internet is at stake, and quite possibly, the future of cultural and musical expression as well.

Urban Music and the Internet

Because artists on alternative-leaning, underground-oriented labels have rarely enjoyed commercial radio support, they’ve had to turn to cyberspace to get the word out about their releases and tour dates. Blogs, chatrooms, and fan forums have allowed listeners to share music and interact with each other, and in many cases, with artists directly.

“The Internet, that’s ‘it’ for independent artists,” says Paul Porter, a former BET executive who now operates Industry Ears, a non-profit music business watchdog organization. With an increasing number of urban artists taking the independent route, maintaining access to the Internet becomes critical for long-term survival.

“What’s happening on the Internet is that’s the only place you’re hearing real music and real news,” Porter says.

“The Internet is more vital for indie and underground artists in urban music
than any other available media,” echoes Asya Shein, founder of urban culture site Fusicology.com, which operates in 17 North American markets through a combination of street-level promotion and online activities ranging from album reviews to event marketing.

The Internet, Shein says, “allows the artist to directly connect with their fanbase in a direct and inexpensive manner.” That’s important, she adds, “considering most music on the radio is neither indie nor underground — in the urban sector, especially.”

The Internet levels the playing field in very real terms for urban artists who face a significant barrier to entry into mainstream outlets. Examples include independent labels like Hieroglyphics, Quannum, Stones Throw and Rhymesayers — cornerstones of underground hip-hop whose Internet presence has been critical to their building a diverse, dedicated fan base over the years. All of these labels have featured unique content (i.e., music videos MTV or BET won’t air or exclusive freestyles) online, and their websites have been extremely important in their being able to brand themselves and create revenue streams.

“We’re the original Internet label,” says Tajai Massey of Hiero Imperium, whose Web presence helped the eight-member Hieroglyphics collective reinvent themselves way back in 1997 — long before YouTube or MySpace were even in existence — as an independent entity following stints on major labels.

“When we first came up, nobody had the Internet. It was a means of mobilizing our fans,” Massey relates, adding that Hiero’s online presence remains an integral part of their marketing and promotional strategy: “Nowadays it’s impossible to get the word out without the Internet.”
According to Lateef the Truthspeaker, a core Quannum artist who’s been putting out records independently since the mid-’90s, the Internet has become a tastemaker in and of itself: “Especially at a time when everything’s changing, the Internet influence just can’t be denied now.” He cites “the access that involves the youth, and the empowerment to the youth in deciding what is and isn’t successful… I think that that’s really big.”

Artists and fans aren’t the only people for whom the Internet is empowering. As urban music publications have fallen by the wayside, bloggers have picked up some of the slack, offering opinions, reviews, and commentary unfettered by the conflicts of interest with advertisers which have long been an albatross for urban media outlets.

“The blogosphere has reestablished a balance between what people want to see and read and what publications choose to omit,” says Adisa Banjoko, author of the Lyrical Swords blog.
There has been a dumbing down of hip-hop journalism in general over the past decade, yet urban bloggers like Banjoko, Jeff Chang, Clyde Smith and Matt Sonzala have conswasdfistently presented information unavailable anywhere else.

Stay tuned for the next installment of this article.

About the Author:

Eric K. Arnold has been writing about urban music culture since the mid-1990s, when he was the Managing Editor of now-defunct 4080 Magazine. Since then, he’s been a columnist for such publications as The Source, XXL, Murder Dog, Africana.com, and the East Bay Express; his work has also appeared in the San Francisco Chronicle, Vibe, Wax Poetics, SF Weekly, XLR8R, the Village Voice and Jamrock, as well as the academic anthologies Total Chaos and The Vinyl Ain’t Final. Eric began his journalistic career while DJing on college radio station KZSC, and remembers well the early days of hip-hop radio, before consolidation, and commercialization set in. He currently lives in Oakland, California.

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

FMC and realizePhiladelphia Present: Web.illish.us



We at Future of Music Coalition recognize the difficulty of explaining complicated issues in plain language, but we do our best. Right now, a huge concern is net neutrality, which also happens to be kinda tricky to articulate. Luckily, we've had some practice!

Our Rock the Net website offers an excellent primer on why net neutrality should matter to the music community. In a nutshell, net neutrality protects the open internet, and allows all artists to promote and distribute their music online without undue interference from gatekeepers or middlemen. The internet is THE tool for the modern musician to connect with fans, and it shouldn't be controlled by a few ISPs looking to maximize profits.

Fans would also be affected if we lose the open internet. Let's face it, there are more legal ways than ever to discover new music — but without net neutrality, this could change. We've seen what happens when the majority of musicians have limited access to your ears — it's called commercial radio. If net neutrality goes away, the internet could resemble the corporate airwaves, where what you hear is determined by a handful of powerful companies.

And that's just the tip of the iceberg. Net neutrality ensures that freedom of expression, commerce and creativity can flourish on the web. If the network operators are allowed to decide what goes over their "tubes," our digital way of life could be permanently altered. That's why we've teamed up with realizePhiladelphia — a non-profit group that promotes social causes in the City of Brotherly Love through musical and educational events — for the Web.illish.us concert series.

FMC and realizePhiladelphia will present a handful of monthly shows at Philadelphia's Silk City, which educate on net neutrality in fun and unique ways. Hosted by Charles Gregory of 3guysdontlie.com and streettalkin.com, Web.illish.us encourages progressive attitudes on technology, media, music, arts and culture in the online realm.

Web.illish.us takes place on the third Wednesday of the month from November 19, 2009-February 18, 2009. All shows start at 9PM EST. If you're unable to attend in person, have no fear: the concerts will be webcast live. Check out the Web.illish.us site for details on the specific theme for each event, and stay tuned for more info.

Hope to see you there!